The founding director of Plain English Campaign, Chrissie Maher, has slammed the government over the Heathrow expansion consultation document. Speaking at the campaign’s headquarters in Derbyshire earlier this week, she described the document as ‘atrocious’.
Susan Kramer, MP for Richmond Park sent a copy of the document to the campaign. “This document effectively takes away human rights,” said Chrissie. “No ordinary person with an interest in the plans to expand Heathrow could be expected to read and understand this.”
Chrissie found several faults in the document, including the following:
- Excessive jargon in the summary, such as ‘periodic emissions cost assessment’ and ‘external climate change costs.’
- Huge assumptions about the reader’s knowledge of government policy.
- Jargon specific to particular professions, such as ‘net present value terms’ and ‘mixed mode operations’.
- An unclear introduction in Section A of the document.
- Section B makes use of terms which are not familiar to most people.
- Section D uses technical terminology such as ‘operation of runway rotation’.
“How can this be a true consultation if most readers cannot understand the document? We’ve seen this time and time again - local councils and government departments are always launching ‘consultations’. But they are not real consultations because they design them in such a way that most people are unable to take part.”
“After all these years of our campaigning, the Government should realise they can’t treat people with the contempt shown in the past. Unfortunately, once again we see more proof that this is not always the case. We are not ‘taking sides’ in the debate, but it is so important that in a democracy, consultations are genuine. People must have a fair chance to understand the documents put before them. Otherwise they cannot tell you what they really think.
“I am calling on the Department of Transport to withdraw and redraft this document.”