Plain English Campaign - Fighting for clearer communication since 1979 Crystal clear

HomeChrissie's storyContact UsFAQsPlain English surveySign upSitemapText sizeUseful links

Legal

Law

In 1936, Fred Rodell, a professor of law at Yale University, argued that there 'are two things wrong with almost all legal writing. One is its style. The other is its content. That, I think, about covers the ground.'

Legal documents usually set out our rights and responsibilities. If we cannot understand the documents, we cannot exercise our rights and we cannot take responsibility.

It is possible to use plain English in legal documents. It does not mean sacrificing accuracy for clarity. The excuse that legal writing has to be complex to avoid misinterpretations does not stand up.

We want your examples of legal documents that are not clearly written. You can e-mail us at law@plainenglish.co.uk

You can search for news stories about law or examples of legal gobbledygook using the search tool on the left, or by visiting the Past newsletters section or the Golden Bulls archive.


More information


Drafting in plain English

Examples of legal jargon


Our A to Z glossary of legal terms

Unfair terms in consumer contracts


About this site | Disclaimer | Legal Issues |

© 2006 Plain English Campaign ||| This page was last updated on 14 December, 2007

Valid CSS!   Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional!    Download Adobe Reader to view pdf documents